Other views

Kininigen Blog

The collateral account is a debt and not a credit balance

Who does not need his eyes to see,
she's gonna need to cry.

No millions up, at least not for us,
but in the red.
It is the royalty to the Pope, for the use of the name.


Because we are slaves

Children of slaves who carry on the slave debts of their ancestors.

Which are judged and treated according to the slave law of the Romans. Thus also the famous collateral account is a DEBT and not a credit.

Since the modern man, bombarded with short-lived news, rarely has the time to read long articles to the end, my conclusion, which I originally wanted to put at the end, comes directly at the beginning, and the explanation and execution comes afterwards.

I know this statement that the collateral account is a debt, contrary to the usual teaching that it is a huge credit that immediately activates the lower desires and the longing for an easy, materially fulfilled life, turns everything that commerce teaches on its head. We all want to go back to the way things were on this planet. Abundance and peace and happiness.

This what we are making as a claim here, we have proven with ancient scriptures. Not a single one out there teaches this variant, because they were all deceived and let run in the wrong direction. Most of them need a while to process this information.

However, private commerce is like any doctrine on our occupied world - truth mixed with lies so that the reader's gut instinct can be tricked and steered in the desired direction. The Luciferian plane, takes the truth and turns it upside down. This is how the powers that be operate here in the world. For the aspirations and energy of the awakened people must be channeled in a controlled manner, or eventually the place will blow up in their faces. So one offers an apparent solution, with which one lets these recalcitrants, who dared to look for the cause, run again in the circle and thus further in the hamster wheel. At some point you give up because it doesn't work and costs so much energy.

We checked this, our claim, also on an energetic level and we could clearly see the picture of this trap. This realization, which we also perceived incredulously at first, was confirmed to us quite clearly on this level.

Already in 1840 Jacob Venedey wrote the following lines in his book "Römertum und Germanentum Umgestaltung der Sklaverei":

Jacob Venedey "Romanism and Germanism - Transformation of Slavery":

"The old Roman Empire, was founded by a band of robbers and vagabonds, whose leader had been suckled by a she-wolf. The gates of the new city were open to any whom the neighbouring towns cast out as criminals or unworthy of citizenship. And when the number of men streaming in from all sides became too great for the number of Roman women, the Romans stole the wives and daughters of the neighboring cities. Thus the band of robbers became the state, thus robbery became conquest and robbers became conquerors.The law of the strongest is that of conquest, and so Rome existed only as long as it was able to make conquests. Wealth was considered an honour, and through it one attained fame, positions and power. Virtue disappeared, poverty became a disgrace, and purity of morals was considered strange. The youth, educated in luxury and extravagance, gave themselves up to debauchery, ambition and greed. They stole in order to squander what they had stolen, they despised what they possessed and lusted after what they did not possess. Honor, morality, virtue, all divine and human laws (natural law) were disregarded, and one strove for nothing but the means by which one could satisfy desires contrary to nature. Men dishonor themselves by the shameful debasement of themselves. Indulgence goes so far that all lands and all seas are scarcely sufficient to fill the tables and dishes. Youth, accustomed to vice, abandons itself to theft and murder as soon as it runs out of money. Torn by passions, she is compelled to seek all means to gratify them, and theft and profligacy join hands and help each other mutually.Oppression was the breath that gave Rome life. It was at constant war with humanity."

This wealth of Rome, had as a basis the slavery. The terms factory slavery (Elemer Polay) or mass slavery, took their origin there. This mass slavery was the foundation of Rome's wealth, but also her downfall. For Rome made a mistake. The slaves knew that they were slaves.

They were aware of the slave status.

And at some point, this knowledge brought down the Roman Empire of criminals, who are always portrayed in such a sophisticated way in today's history.

My contention, however, is that it happened only superficially.

"In the sixteenth, and especially in the seventeenth century, this blind and servile subjection of the courts to a foreign code, which remained unknown to the people even for the sake of their language, reached its deepest degree. It came to such a pass that in some respects there were two laws, 1) a learned one in force in the courts, according to which the parties, if they had the misfortune of a trial, were judged, but which they, if they did not themselves have learned education, neither knew before the trial, and frequently also understood after the trial only in its power, but not in its spirit and context, which moreover was expressed only in Latin; and 2) a popular law, founded in the popular custom and in the ingrained and conventional legal feeling of the people, and peacefully surviving in the real circumstances, intelligible to the parties, of which the judges neither knew nor wished to know."

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar - German Private Law 1860

The powers that be were aware of this small systemic flaw and realized that a restructuring was needed.

The newly sprouted religion of the acquiescent slave, which had already been well used for immobilization ("God wants it this way", "Always stay in love and turn the other cheek when you are hit" - reminds me of the newly installed esotericism, the new "Christianity" with their mottos - "Everything you experience, WATCH You just to learn", "You chose that yourself before"... "Accept everything in love...", "We are all One..." etc. etc.), they decided to expand.

The Constantinian turn with the now obviously known forgery, called donation, formed the basis for this. The emperor's new clothes were now those of a pope. One put new clothes on the pig, so to speak. Thus the Roman right with the beloved slavery crept secretly over the back door into the laws of the free peoples. And today.... the inclined reader will have to admit, we have the conditions of Rome as described above. The systemic error, however, has been corrected. Today's slaves do not even notice that they are slaves. It is nevertheless every day eingebläut to them, in what a free world we live nevertheless - we can choose always completely freely our television station.

They subtly realize that they are not free, but cannot really grasp anything. This feeling is like a fog. Visible, but nothing that can be grasped and fixed. Also, the common slave is left no free time for such thoughts in his day controlled by the economic hamster wheel.

The new arenas have been converted, but they still serve the same purpose. The immobilization of the masses. The technical possibilities available in this era, make the control even more efficient and profound. Flouride, aspartame, glutamate and electromagnetic wave control. Ready is the lethargic existing being, who thinks he is the person.

But the key point remains. We are all traded and dealt with according to the law of slaves.

But what exactly is slavery?



Is the condition of a human being who is deprived of his personal freedom, is treated as a thing, and as such is the property of another. In the ancient world, whose economic system was largely based on slavery, slavery was widespread, in that slaves were generally used to perform domestic and industrial services, and prisoners of war in particular had been used for this purpose since ancient times. Thus, in ancient times, we find slavery widespread among the peoples of the Orient as well as among the Greeks and Romans, the latter of whom had developed slavery into a special legal institution. The slave (servus) had under Roman lawThe slave was a mere object of trade, slave children were slaves by birth, the master had the right over the life and death of the slave. He was a mere object of trade, slave children were slaves from birth, the master had the right over the life and death of the slave. What the slave earned belonged to the master. Only gradually did the peculium system develop, which allowed slaves to acquire their own property (peculium) from their secondary earnings in a limited way, thus giving them the opportunity to buy their freedom. But even the freedmen (libertini) were still dependent on the patron who had freed them.

Definition slave
Mayer's encyclopedia

The slave of Rome and of old was considered a thing, and his master could do what he wanted with the thing, destroy it, sell it, use it in all ways for his service. All that the slave possessed, what he gained, belonged to the master.

The Teutonic servant lived under the suzerainty of his patron, but he was not therefore regarded and treated as a thing. He had certain actual rights, though not protected by state law; he could acquire for himself, and paid in labor, fruit, clothing, or later in money, a certain tribute to his lord."

Jacob Venedey - Romanism, Christianity and Germanicism in their interaction in the transformation of slavery from the year 1860

After the Roman law slaves have no right to property, ownership or legal capacity - that person.

According to Roman law, children of slaves are also slaves.

A slave has no right to defend himself in court (nowadays it's called the duty of a lawyer, precisely because we are not of age and therefore under supervision).

Our labor is mortgaged and traded on the market.

Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

Since we are thus denied the right of personality and thus denied participation in the system, as slaves we are subjected to lawlessness. not a separate person to be allowed/able to have - one is put to us - identically on the name given to us by the producers - for the sake of simplicity, one has to be interested in the newly produced Slaves no new names and to disguise it, and so the slave does not notice at all, that the spiritual property of him of seienen slave-parents given name (not even that, because everything the slave does, owns and even thinks about belongs to his master from the beginning) and was claimed for himself by his slave master .

Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

Since our labor was pledged in advance ( according to the doctrine of private commerce - due to state bankruptcy, as collateral to the banks) - we stand in Debt bondage.

But what exactly is debt bondage? Let's take a look at good old Wikipedia, which doesn't feel obliged to lie about such things:

Debt bondage Wikipedia:

Debt bondage (obsolete Obnoxiation)[1] is the legal status or situation of an insolvent person. Debtor, who in Servitude ...and I'm not sure... As Security over the Creditors he has to put his manpower pledgeBut he has no prospect of paying off his debt and getting free again through the work he has done. The creditor can decide alone and arbitrarily on the nature and duration of the dependence. This results in a dependency that is intended to be permanent, slavery-like Dependency relationship characterized by unilateral exploitation. According to a definition of the United Nations, it can also be the case that the debtor pledges the labour of a person dependent on him.

Collateral account is a debt account

So how did this happen?

What happened?

Pope makes us slaves

But how do we get into debt bondage? Just because we are children of slaves, since our parents and grandparents, etc., are already slaves? Hasn't slavery been outlawed? Theoretically, yes. But as we are taught even in the slave training school, called school? Silence is consent and this is exactly how it is practiced in the system.

Bull Unam Sanctam 1302

In 1302, Pope Boniface VIII declared himself ruler of the world in both spiritual and temporal matters with the bull Unam Sanctam. In it, he decreed that all living beings on this planet are subject to the pope and thereby claimed control over the entire earth.

Bull Romanus Pontifex 1455

Pope Nicholas V then decreed in the papal bull Romanus Pontifex in 1455 that the newborn child be separated from all right to property.

Aeterni Regis 1481

Pope Sixtus IV, by the bull Aeterni Regis (roughly "Eternal Dominion" or "Perpetual Possession of the Sovereign") issued in 1481, deprived the child of his rights to his body. Thus, from birth, everyone is condemned to eternal servitude.

Bull of Convocation 1537

This was followed in 1537 by Pope Paul III's Papal Bull of Convocation, in which the Roman Catholic Church laid claim to the soul of the child.

Thus, these proclamations of the "holy" FATHER, whose immature sheep/children we are, still stand perfectly valid and legitimate in space.


Not rejected.

General Accepted.

Accepted by silence and thereby legitimized.

Just as a right.

Everything on the planet belongs to him. Even all people, including your possessions, your body, even your soul. Why should the devil still come to earth and haggle for the individual souls, except out of boredom coupled with ego confirmation? His deputy does his job quite well after all....

Since the majority of people (whether Christianity or unconsciously, through the negative selection of its offshoot and creation Islam, or the other branch Judaism) still accept and regard it as a "holy" institution, it legitimizes it in its claim on the world and all that is in it.

Thus these bulls are valid until today! And every man his slave. He is the "Holy" Father.

Since the Pope, as the Vicar of God. proclaimed that the earth and everything on it belongs to him, we can never be the owner of anything - on the one hand because everything belongs to him anyway, on the other hand because slaves cannot own property anyway, because as it is said according to Roman law, everything a slave acquires, he acquires for his master. If the slave means to acquire it and considers himself the owner, it is to be led back on the infantility of the slave...

After all, it is clearly stated in the vehicle registration document, for example, that this is not proof of ownership. If the residential property were indeed ours, then, from a purely logical point of view, one would not have to pay any property tax on one's already purchased property, nor would one have to pay any tax on one's inheritance or on what one earns, in wages and salary.... In modern parlance it could be called royalties for use.

The new revised system of slavery of Rome 2.0 in the update, is thus a mixture of slavery, debt bondage and fealty. Perfectly combined, veiled, so that the New Ring enslaves the slaves forever - without the annoying slave revolts of the past, of course, and without them noticing how this comes about and from where - in a system of many straw men called government, party - which refer to democratic elections (from their contempt for the common rabble, they make no secret even in the name of it - because the etymological meaning clearly names it as "rule of the scum") and shrug their shoulders and say "you have chosen, it was YOUR decision" ... That all this is of course a play on a stage escapes most hard working slaves. Because just because you vote, it does not mean that it is also counted accordingly.

It also does not matter whether one belongs to Christianity, is baptized or not.

Baptism, by the way, means to immerse, to make deep.

The Origin Dictionary to the Duden (Duden, Vol. 7, Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus, 2007) explains the origin of the word "taufen" thus:

taufen: The gemeingerm. verb taufen, ahd. toufan, got. daupjan, aengl. diepan, Swedish döpa is derived from the adjective treated under tief. So it actually means "to make deep", i.e. "to immerse, to submerge".

With this process the human being is dipped into the Holy Sea of the Vatican (maritime law) and handed over to it and at the same time placed low. But since everyone and everything belongs to the Vatican according to the cops anyway, this act does not really play the big role to belong to the inventory.

We now look at the role of the father in Roman law and among the Romans.

Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762

Paternal authority is that which is vested in parents over their children, or in grandparents over their grandchildren, by virtue of which they have complete government of their persons, and unlimited administration of their property.

...which therefore is not to be inferred from any such presumed consent of the children, or special contracts....

...Act in the court, and may represent named persons...

...only the father is in charge of the children...

...that in the former, the father could sell the children without distinction...

Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762

Because after Roman law the children were always in the father's manus, under his hand. At the father's discretion, he could do with the children as he pleased. Also sell. The detachment or release of the son from the father took place in a ritual of the mock SALE of the son. There was also a law that if the father had sold his son three times, he was automatically free. So much to the moral attitude of the Romans, which probably also the "holy" Roman father on the Papstron lives.

Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721
Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

"The slave is not person,
but thing"

Ignaz Jastrow - Criminal Law Position of the Slave 1878

Ignaz Jastrow - Criminal Law Position of the Slave 1878

How do you want to fight something and revolt against it, if you don't even know WHAT you are supposed to revolt against. And if then nevertheless times the slaves revolt and overthrow a straw man called government, then one installs evenly a new one.

So the great debt we have to pay is that the natural (and legal) person) is provided by the system. Because we are lawless. This is precisely the wonderful, coveted and longed for collateral account. The famous carrot in front of the donkey that makes it run.

In the Commercial courses and the knowledge imparted, it is touted as OUR property, of which we are the beneficiaries.

The account on which "our" name Millions lie and with which everything is PRE-PAYED. And it had been created for our good, but since we have not yet recognized our value, like children, it is still withheld from us. And everybody believes this nonsense... As if in this system of the matrix something was ever created for the benefit of the people... It is a huge minus amount (to our disadvantage), which results from the fact that this system was introduced at some point and since this debt can never be paid off by the licensee of the person in his life, his children continue as pawns and heirs of this debt. It is perpetual debt bondage. Beyond death.

The collateral account is also called the basis and effect of acceptances, so everyone who tries it, shoots himself in the own leg ... Because a real success, which could not demonstrate and prove any commercialist that we know.

Let's have a look at what the word collator means and take the good Johann Christoph Nehring with his book Historisch-Politisch-Juristisches Lexikon from 1710 as a source:

Collator... who confers an office or benefice; so also are the patrons of the parishes called. Collatur, a parish fief/ as Jus collaturae the parish naming and appointing right.

Johann Christoph Nehring
Historical-Political-Juridical Dictionary of 1710

What is a person?


"One calls a person that quality of a human being on which his condition in the republic depends and from which the rights of each in particular are to be recognized. In Rome a great distinction was made between a man and a person, since the servants (slaves are meant here - since the Germanic servant had a different legal status than the servus under Roman law) by no means led a person."

Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762
Mayers Konversations-lexikon 1877

In Mayer's Konversationslexikon 1877 we find the following statement:

"Person (lat. Persona), originally the larva or mask covering the entire head, by means of which actors in antiquity expressed the character of their role; then also the acting role: the way in which a person presents himself outwardly; in general, the term for the actual characteristic of a person; in jurisprudence, any being that can be the subject of rights and legal relationships. In the latter respect, the concepts of person and man are not the same, inasmuch as there are persons who are not persons, and inasmuch as there were, at least formerly, persons who were not persons. For legislation, by constructing what is called a juridical person, has given the possibility of attaching personality to something other than a physical individual..."

Mayers Konversations-lexikon 1877

".... On the other hand, the slave of antiquity was without rights; he was considered a thing, precisely because he lacked the right of personality, the legal capacity, which nowadays in civilized states belongs to every man."

According to Wiesand, G. S. - Juristisches Handbuch die teutschen Rechte 1762

personam ammitere means as much as,
...than lose his liberty.

Wiesand, G. S. - Legal Handbook of German Rights 1762

But since people therefore need a person in order to be able to participate in life quasi independently, and the representative who has been recognized for hundreds of years is so nice and takes care of his sheep under his hand (manus), the following happens...

The slave parents who gave birth to a slave baby go to their administrative point, called office, and report the new property to its owner (or to the administrator, because the pope is also only the administrator...).

Thus a bond, called a natural person with the birth certificate is created, the value of the new slave is calculated on the basis of his origin, and thus the price of the license, the loan fee, the fief value is fixed.

Because the term obligation is a DEBT according to the legal dictionary from 1783. The collateral account is therefore from all the above concluded not a credit. It is a debt! A debt which is imposed on the human being and by means of which he is subjugated until the end of his life. Since the sum is set very high, since one must still work off the debts of the ancestors and forefathers and all the extorted royalties - taxes called, are not covered, the descendants of the slaves come again automatically into the slavery, the debt bondage. Because bonds are connections.

Obligatio a connection or link/obligation/legal bond/by which we are compelled/to perform or pay something.

Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721

"A bond is a document by which a person undertakes to pay a debt to another person. It can be issued by all persons who can bind themselves according to the law, but not by minors and others.

Wiesand - Legal Handbook of German Rights 1762

Obligatio is also the name of a bond...

Lemke, Johann Friedrich Wilhelm - Legal Dictionary 1783

Thus, the people who are aware of the injustice of the system and go in search of how to escape from it all will sooner or later come across the Private Commercial who, like everything else in the exoteric world, mixes truth with lies. One turns the truth in the Luciferic system by 180° and then lets the people with the doctrine about the acceptance, once again walk so beautifully into the trap. As punishment quasi for the disobedience of the slave.

speaking of



Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721

Accepta sententia, an accepted/accepted verdict.

Acceptans, the one who accepts the bill elsewhere.

Acceptatio juramenti, the acceptance of the oath, is/when one actually offers oneself in a certain time for the deposition of the oath awarded and at the same time asks/that the opposing party be citied to it, then a certain date ad jurandum is set/at which/if both do not appear/the date is held pro circumducto/and therefore the one/who is interested in settling the matter/must at his own expense/extract another date/ but if only one appears/he must strive/that the other remaining out may be accused of disobedience/and so the oath may either be sworn or remitted/held.

Thus the current construct surrounding us and weaving itself into the system is slavery, serfdom with some form of fiefdom... As the worldly lord, the Pope as head of the Vatican thus does not have to worry about the administration in detail. That takes over for him the slave, who knows nothing about it that he is slave. So he can not revolt, as in ancient Rome.

Our everyday life situation also fits the description of serfdom excellently, which is what it is.

Hayme, Thomas - Old German Legal Dictionary 1738
Mayer's Encyclopedia of Conversation

The Roman Empire, and Rome as a generic term for all the depravity, was unfortunately not defeated by the Germanic tribes (which, excitingly, is why you don't learn about it in history class.) But rather it remained in transformation and came through the back door. Slowly and steadily. And successfully put itself back in the saddle as the Roman law of justice that rides us to this day.

Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861

The clear aspiration of Germany at the time, was quite clearly the abolition of serfdom, which was never on a par with slavery anyway, as servants at least had certain rights.

So, once again, a problem was created and then the solution was offered, thus rebuilding the society of the people who had once been the victors over Rome.

Also, the church explicitly worked to establish and maintain serfdom.

Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861
Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19th century from the year 1861

Quotation from a prize-writing crowned by the theological faculty of Munich:

Josef Margraf - Church and Slavery since the Discovery of America, or What Has the Catholic Church Done Since the Discovery of America Partly to Mitigate and partly to Abolish Slavery? From the year 1865

If these lines have been approved by a theological faculty and have even won an award, then this can be regarded as an absolute confirmation of the church and as the truth confirmed by it.

The freedom of each has as its logical limits, the freedom of others.

In order to be truly free in this world with its system, one must discard the borrowed person and cancel the contracts.

It is hereby noted that all rights are reserved to everything found on this site and subject to the order of the Decided Terms of Ama-gi koru-E Kininigen. If someone distributes our knowledge, it would be honorable if he also names the source of this knowledge, which was not to be found anywhere else, and does not bring it as his own knowledge into the world to enrich his status with it.

Otherwise, we are grateful for the distribution of this knowledge, in the sense of every being.