Other views

Kininigen Blog

The collateral account is a debt and not a credit balance

Who does not need his eyes to see,
she's gonna need to cry.

No millions up, at least not for us,
but in the red.
It is the royalty to the Pope, for the use of the name.


Because we are slaves

Children of slaves who carry on the slave debts of their ancestors.

Which are judged and treated according to the slave law of the Romans. Thus also the famous collateral account is a DEBT and not a credit.

Since the modern man, bombarded with short-lived news, rarely has the time to read long articles to the end, my conclusion, which I originally wanted to put at the end, comes directly at the beginning, and the explanation and execution comes afterwards.

I know this statement that the collateral account is a debt, contrary to the usual teaching that it is a huge credit that immediately activates the lower desires and the longing for an easy, materially fulfilled life, turns everything that commerce teaches on its head. We all want to go back to the way things were on this planet. Abundance and peace and happiness.

This what we are making as a claim here, we have proven with ancient scriptures. Not a single one out there teaches this variant, because they were all deceived and let run in the wrong direction. Most of them need a while to process this information.

However, private commerce is like any doctrine in our occupied world - truth mixed with lies so that the reader's gut feeling can be tricked and steered in the desired direction. The Luciferian level takes the truth and turns it on its head. 

This is how those in power operate here in the world. Because the aspirations and energy of the awakened people have to be channeled in a controlled manner, otherwise the whole thing will blow up in their faces at some point. So you offer an apparent solution with which you let these stubborn people who dared to look for the cause run in circles again and thus continue in the hamster wheel. At some point you give up because it doesn't work and takes so much energy.

We checked this, our claim, also on an energetic level and we could clearly see the picture of this trap. This realization, which we also perceived incredulously at first, was confirmed to us quite clearly on this level.


As early as 1840, Jacob Venedey wrote the following lines in his book “Romanism and Germanism Reshaping Slavery”:

Jacob Venedey "Romanism and Germanism - Transformation of Slavery":

“The ancient Roman Empire was founded by a band of robbers and vagabonds whose leader was suckled by a she-wolf. The gates of the new city were open to anyone whom the neighboring cities rejected as criminals or unworthy of civil rights. And when the number of men streaming in from all sides became too great for the number of Roman women, the Romans stole the wives and daughters of the neighboring cities.

This is how the band of robbers became a state, robbery became conquest and robbers became conquerors. This formed the basis of the city that was destined to one day rule over the entire civilized world.

The law of the stronger is that of conquest and so Rome only existed as long as it was able to conquer. Wealth was considered an honor and through it one came to fame, positions and power. Virtue disappeared, poverty became a disgrace and moral purity was considered strange. The youth, brought up in luxury and waste, gave in to debauchery, ambition and money-seeking. People stole to waste what they stole, they despised what they had and lusted after what they didn't have.

Honor, morality, virtue, all divine and human laws (natural law) were misunderstood and people strived for nothing but the means with which they could satisfy desires contrary to nature. Men dishonor themselves through the shameful degradation of themselves. The indulgence goes so far that all the lands and all the seas are hardly enough to fill the tables and dishes.

The youth, accustomed to vice, give in to theft and murder as soon as they run out of money. Torn by passions, she is forced to seek every means to satisfy them, and theft and waste join hands and help each other. Oppression was the breath that gave life to Rome. It was in constant war against humanity.”

This wealth of Rome, had as a basis the slavery. The terms factory slavery (Elemer Polay) or mass slavery, took their origin there. This mass slavery was the foundation of Rome's wealth, but also her downfall. For Rome made a mistake. The slaves knew that they were slaves.

They were aware of the slave status.

And at some point, this knowledge brought down the Roman Empire of criminals, who are always portrayed in such a sophisticated way in today's history.

My contention, however, is that it happened only superficially.

Collateral Vertigo 001 Blood Clot Min

“In the sixteenth and especially in the seventeenth century, this blind and servile subservience of the courts to a foreign code of law, which remained unknown to the people themselves because of its language, reached its deepest degree.

It got to the point where in some relationships there were two rights,

1) a learned rule in force in the courts, according to which the parties were judged if they had the misfortune of a trial, but which, unless they themselves had learned education, they did not know before the trial and often only after it Power, but not understood in its spirit and context, which, moreover, was only expressed in Latin; and

2) a people's law that is based on popular custom and in the people's rooted and traditional sense of justice and lives on peacefully in the real circumstances, understandable to those involved, about which the judges knew nothing or wanted to know."

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar - German Private Law 1860

The powers that be were aware of this small systemic flaw and realized that a restructuring was needed.

The newly sprouted religion of the acquiescent slave, which had already been well used for immobilization ("God wants it this way", "Always stay in love and turn the other cheek when you are hit" - reminds me of the newly installed esotericism, the new "Christianity" with their mottos - "Everything you experience, WATCH You just to learn", "You chose that yourself before"... "Accept everything in love...", "We are all One..." etc. etc.), they decided to expand.

The Constantinian turn with the now obviously known forgery, called donation, formed the basis for this. The emperor's new clothes were now those of a pope. One put new clothes on the pig, so to speak. Thus the Roman right with the beloved slavery crept secretly over the back door into the laws of the free peoples. And today.... the inclined reader will have to admit, we have the conditions of Rome as described above. The systemic error, however, has been corrected. Today's slaves do not even notice that they are slaves. It is nevertheless every day eingebläut to them, in what a free world we live nevertheless - we can choose always completely freely our television station.

They subtly realize that they are not free, but cannot really grasp anything. This feeling is like a fog. Visible, but nothing that can be grasped and fixed. Also, the common slave is left no free time for such thoughts in his day controlled by the economic hamster wheel.

The new arenas have been converted, but they still serve the same purpose. The immobilization of the masses. The technical possibilities available in this era, make the control even more efficient and profound. Flouride, aspartame, glutamate and electromagnetic wave control. Ready is the lethargic existing being, who thinks he is the person.

But the key point remains. We are all traded and dealt with according to the law of slaves.

But what exactly is slavery?



Is the condition of a person who is deprived of his personal freedom, is treated as a thing and as such is the property of another. 

In the ancient world, whose economic system was largely based on slavery, slavery was widespread, with slaves being used to perform domestic and commercial services, for which prisoners of war had been used since ancient times. 

In ancient times we find slavery widespread among the peoples of the Orient as well as among the Greeks and Romans, the latter of whom had developed slavery into a special legal institution. The slave (servus) had under Roman law, which, by the way, allowed the emergence of slavery through debt bondage in older times, no personality and therefore no legal capacity. 

As a mere thing, it was the subject of trade, slave children were slaves from birth, and the master had the right over the life and death of the slave. Whatever the slave earned belonged to the master. 

Only gradually did the peculia system develop, which allowed slaves to acquire their own assets (peculium) to a limited extent from their additional income and thus gave them the opportunity to buy their freedom. But the freedmen (libertini) were still in a dependent relationship with the patron who had released them.

Definition slave
Mayer's encyclopedia

The slave of Rome and of old was considered a thing, and his master could do what he wanted with the thing, destroy it, sell it, use it in all ways for his service. All that the slave possessed, what he gained, belonged to the master.

The Germanic servant lived under the supremacy of his patron, but he was therefore not viewed or treated as a thing. He had certain actual rights, even if they were not protected by state law; he could acquire for himself and paid a certain tribute to his master in the form of work, fruit, clothing or later in money.”

Venice Jacob Min
Jacob Venedey - Romanism, Christianity and Germanicism in their interaction in the transformation of slavery from the year 1860

After the Roman law slaves have no right to property, ownership or legal capacity - that person.

According to Roman law, children of slaves are also slaves.

A slave has no right to defend himself in court (nowadays it's called the duty of a lawyer, precisely because we are not of age and therefore under supervision).

Our labor is mortgaged and traded on the market.

Monastery Exlibris of the Bavarian State Library Vol. 7 Ca. 1540 1800 Min
Adolf Schmidt – The Personality of the Slave According to Roman Law. 1868 1 Min

According to the same view, the essence of this slavery is not that the slave has a master - because there is servi sine domino - but simply the lack of rights.

A slave is a person without rights:

That is the reason why he is denied personality (because it is the right to have rights) and why he joins the things, especially the res mancipi.

Adolf Schmidt – The Personality of the Slave According to Roman Law. 1868 2 Min
Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

Since we are denied the right to personality and are therefore denied participation in the system, we are slaves to the lack of rights not a separate person to be allowed/able to have subject, we are given one.

For the sake of simplicity and to deceive us, it has the same name as the name given to us by our mother and father. So you have to go for the newly produced ones Slaves no new names come up with and to disguise it. 

So the slave doesn't even notice that the intellectual property was given to him by his slave parents given name was, so to speak, stolen and claimed by his slave master. Strictly speaking, this name wasn't even stolen, because everything the slave does, owns and even thinks about belongs to his master from the start. So, according to Roman law, which is still valid today.

Adolf Schmidt – The Personality of the Slave According to Roman Law. 1868 3 Min
Adolf Schmidt – The Personality of the Slave According to Roman Law. 1868 4 Min
Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

The civile ius of ancient times, to which we must first turn, is completely consistent in its denial of any right for the slave. The lack of all political rights is self-evident: but the same also applies to the two main areas of private law.

First of all, that of the family, because the slave is denied the possibility of marriage and, moreover, the possibility of kinship. And exactly the same in the area of property law, because the slave can have neither property nor claims.

Since our labor was pledged in advance ( according to the doctrine of private commerce - due to state bankruptcy, as collateral to the banks) - we stand in Debt bondage.

But what exactly is debt bondage? Let's take a look at good old Wikipedia, which doesn't feel obliged to lie about such things:

Debt bondage Wikipedia:

Debt bondage (obsolete Obnoxiation)[1] is the legal status or situation of an insolvent person. Debtor, who in Servitude advised. 

As Security over the Creditors he has to put his manpower pledge, although he has no prospect of paying off his debt and being released again through the work he has done. 

The creditor can decide alone and arbitrarily about the type and duration of the dependency. This results in a long-term, slavery-like Dependency relationship characterized by unilateral exploitation. According to a definition of the United Nations, it can also be the case that the debtor pledges the labour of a person dependent on him.


Collateral Account Is A Debt Account

So how did this happen? What happened?

Pope Makes Us Slaves

But how do we end up in debt bondage? 

Just because we are children of slaves, since our parents and grandparents etc. are already treated as slaves? 

Hasn't slavery been banned? Theoretically yes. 

But how are we taught even in the slave training center called school? Silence is consent and this is exactly how it is practiced in the system.

Bull Unam Sanctam 1302

In 1302, Pope Boniface VIII declared himself ruler of the world in both spiritual and temporal matters with the bull Unam Sanctam. In it, he decreed that all living beings on this planet are subject to the pope and thereby claimed control over the entire earth.

Bull Romanus Pontifex 1455

Pope Nicholas V then decreed in the papal bull Romanus Pontifex in 1455 that the newborn child be separated from all right to property.

Aeterni Regis 1481

Pope Sixtus IV, by the bull Aeterni Regis (roughly "Eternal Dominion" or "Perpetual Possession of the Sovereign") issued in 1481, deprived the child of his rights to his body. Thus, from birth, everyone is condemned to eternal servitude.

Thus, these proclamations of the "holy" FATHER, whose immature sheep/children we are, still stand perfectly valid and legitimate in space.


Not rejected.

General Accepted.

Accepted by silence and thereby legitimized.

Just as a right.

Everything on the planet belongs to him. Even all people, including your possessions, your body, even your soul. Why should the devil still come to earth and haggle for the individual souls, except out of boredom coupled with ego confirmation? His deputy does his job quite well after all....

Since the majority of people (whether Christianity or unconsciously, through the negative selection of its offshoot and creation Islam, or the other branch Judaism) still accept and regard it as a "holy" institution, it legitimizes it in its claim on the world and all that is in it.

Thus these bulls are valid until today! And every man his slave. He is the "Holy" Father.

Since the Pope, as the Vicar of God. proclaimed that the earth and everything on it belongs to him, we can never be the owner of anything - on the one hand because everything belongs to him anyway, on the other hand because slaves cannot own property anyway, because as it is said according to Roman law, everything a slave acquires, he acquires for his master. If the slave means to acquire it and considers himself the owner, it is to be led back on the infantility of the slave...

After all, it is clearly stated in the vehicle registration document, for example, that this is not proof of ownership. If the residential property were indeed ours, then, from a purely logical point of view, one would not have to pay any property tax on one's already purchased property, nor would one have to pay any tax on one's inheritance or on what one earns, in wages and salary.... In modern parlance it could be called royalties for use.

The new revised system of slavery in Rome 2.0 in the update is a mixture of slavery, debt bondage and fealty. Perfectly combined, veiled, the new ring enslaves the slaves forever - without the annoying slave revolts of the past, of course, and without them even noticing how this came about and from where. 

In a system made up of many straw men, called government, party - which focus on democratic elections (out of their contempt for the common people, they make no secret in the name of it - because the etymological meaning clearly calls it “rule of the scum ” ) and shrugging their shoulders say “you made your choice, it was YOUR decision”… Most hard-working slaves miss the fact that this is all a spectacle on a stage. Just because you vote doesn't mean it will be counted accordingly.

It also does not matter whether one belongs to Christianity, is baptized or not.

Baptism, by the way, means to immerse, to make deep.

The Origin Dictionary to the Duden (Duden, Vol. 7, Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus, 2007) explains the origin of the word "taufen" thus:

taufen: The gemeingerm. verb taufen, ahd. toufan, got. daupjan, aengl. diepan, Swedish döpa is derived from the adjective treated under tief. So it actually means "to make deep", i.e. "to immerse, to submerge".

With this process, the person is immersed in the Holy Sea of the Vatican (maritime law) and handed over to it and at the same time placed deep. But since everyone and everything in the Vatican belongs to the bulls anyway, this act doesn't really play a big role in being part of the inventory.

According to the Church, baptism is an indelible sign.

The Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Madrid emphasized “that Catholic baptism can never be canceled … Cardinal Rouco said that the Baptism is a sacrament that leaves an indelible mark, and that the person who received it will always remain a Catholic. 

Cardinal Rouco recalls that Baptism is valid “forever and ever,” even though one can deny one’s faith. Being Catholic is something you can’t erase – “it’s part of our DNA.”

(Cardinal Antonio Maria Ruoco Varela, chairman of the Spanish Bishops' Conference from 1999-2005 and from 2008-2014, in kath.net, July 13, 2004)

The Bible itself says under Romans 6:4

So we were buried with him through baptism into death, that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of life.

And at Vatican we can read what Pope Benedict XVI said. on June 27, 2007 in a speech in Rome about those baptized in the church, dated Saint Cyril of Alexandria (380-444) quoted:

»You have fallen into the nets of the church (cf. Mt 13:47). So let yourself be taken alive; don't run away, because it is Jesus, who takes you on his hook, not to give you death, but resurrection after death. For you must die and rise again."

Pope Francis said at one General audience on May 9, 2018

"The Baptism is administered once and for all; it cannot be repeated and describes the Christian with an indelible spiritual seal.

The Integration of the person being baptized into the Catholic Church is irrevocable (see also Axel von Campenhausen, Handbook of State Church Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edition, Berlin 1994, p.759 f.), which is why the Church also refuses to remove those who have left the register of baptized people.


In the Catechism 1250, which is still valid today, it says:

“Since children are born with a fallen human nature tainted by original sin, they too need rebirth in baptism in order to be freed from the power of darkness and transferred to the kingdom of freedom of the children of God to which all people “The Church and the parents would be depriving the child of the inestimable grace of becoming a child of God if they did not grant him baptism soon after birth.”

Catechism, 1269:

Having become a member of the Church, the baptized no longer belongs to himself, but to him who died and rose again for us. Therefore, in the community of the church, he should submit to others, serve them, and obey the leaders of the church, submit to them, recognize and highly respect them.”

Can. 96Through baptism man becomes human incorporated into the Church of Christ and becomes part of it to the person with the duties and rights, which are peculiar to Christians, taking into account their respective status, as long as they are in the ecclesiastical community and unless a lawfully imposed sanction conflicts with them.


Baptism From Human To Person

We now look at the role of the father in Roman law and among the Romans.

Help field 1 min
Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762

Paternal authority is that which is vested in parents over their children, or in grandparents over their grandchildren, by virtue of which they have complete government of their persons, and unlimited administration of their property.

...which therefore is not to be inferred from any such presumed consent of the children, or special contracts....

...Act in the court, and may represent named persons...

...only the father is in charge of the children...

...that in the former, the father could sell the children without distinction...

Help field 2 min
Help field 3 min
Helpfield 4 Min
Help field 5 min
Helpfield 6 Min
Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762

Because after Roman law The children were always in the father's manus, under his hand. According to his father's discretion, he could do as he wished with the children. Also sell... 

The separation or release of the son from the father took place in a ritual of the apparent SALE of the son. 

There was also a law that if the father sold his son three times, he was automatically free. 

So much for the moral attitude of the Romans, which probably also the “Holy” Roman Father on the Papstron lives.

Oberlaender Samue
Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721
Smith 01
Smith 02
Adolf Schmidt - The Personality of the Slave under Roman Law. 1868

"The slave is not person,
but thing"

Ignaz Jastrow - Criminal Law Position of the Slave 1878

Jastrow 01
Jastrow 02
Jastrow 03
Treatise Slaves and Collateral Html A5C88063312B8198
Jastrow 05
Jastrow 06
Ignaz Jastrow - Criminal Law Position of the Slave 1878

How do you want to fight something and revolt against it, if you don't even know WHAT you are supposed to revolt against. And if then nevertheless times the slaves revolt and overthrow a straw man called government, then one installs evenly a new one.

So the great debt we have to pay is that the natural (and legal) person) is provided by the system. Because we are lawless. This is precisely the wonderful, coveted and longed for collateral account. The famous carrot in front of the donkey that makes it run.

In the Commercial courses and the knowledge imparted, it is touted as OUR property, of which we are the beneficiaries.

The account on which "our" name Millions lie and with which everything is PRE-PAYED. And it had been created for our good, but since we have not yet recognized our value, like children, it is still withheld from us. And everybody believes this nonsense... As if in this system of the matrix something was ever created for the benefit of the people... It is a huge minus amount (to our disadvantage), which results from the fact that this system was introduced at some point and since this debt can never be paid off by the licensee of the person in his life, his children continue as pawns and heirs of this debt. It is perpetual debt bondage. Beyond death.

The collateral account is also called the basis and effect of acceptances, so everyone who tries it, shoots himself in the own leg ... Because a real success, which could not demonstrate and prove any commercialist that we know.

Let's have a look at what the word collator means and take the good Johann Christoph Nehring with his book Historisch-Politisch-Juristisches Lexikon from 1710 as a source:

Collator... who confers an office or benefice; so also are the patrons of the parishes called. Collatur, a parish fief/ as Jus collaturae the parish naming and appointing right.


Meadow Min
Johann Christoph Nehring
Historical-Political-Juridical Dictionary of 1710

What is a person?


“A person is called that characteristic of a human being on which his condition in the Republic depends and from which each individual's own rights can be recognized in particular. 

In Rome, a big distinction was made between a human being and a person, since the servants (here we mean slaves - since the Germanic servant had a different legal status than the servus under Roman law) by no means led a person."

Hellfeld, Johann August - Repertorivm Reale Practicvm Ivris Privati Imperii Romano-Germanici 1762
Brightfield Person Definition Min
Mayers Conv Person Min
Mayers Konversations-lexikon 1877

In Mayer's Konversationslexikon 1877 we find the following statement:

“Person (Latin Persona), originally the larva or mask covering the entire head, through which actors in ancient times expressed the character of their role; 

then also the performing role: the way in which a person presents themselves externally; 

In general, a term for what is actually characteristic of a human being, in legal science any being that can be the subject of rights and legal relationships. 

In the latter respect, the concepts person and human being are not the same insofar as there are persons who are not human beings, and at least previously there were people who were not persons. 

By constructing a so-called legal person, legislation has made it possible to link personality to something other than a physical individual..."

Mayers Konv Person2 Min
Mayers Konversations-lexikon 1877

“…. on the other hand, the slave of antiquity had no rights; it was considered a cause precisely because it lacked the right of personality, the legal capacity, which today every person in civilized states has.”

According to Wiesand, G. S. - Juristisches Handbuch die teutschen Rechte 1762

personam ammitere means as much as,
...than lose his liberty.

Meadow02 Min
Wiesand, G. S. - Legal Handbook of German Rights 1762

But since people therefore need a person in order to be able to participate in life more or less independently, and the representative who has been recognized for hundreds of years is so nice and takes care of his sheep under his hand (manus), the following happens...

The slave parents who gave birth to a slave baby go to their administrative point, called office, and report the new property to its owner (or to the administrator, because the pope is also only the administrator...).

This means that over the Names A bond, called a natural person, was created with the birth certificate, the value of the new slave was calculated based on his origins and thus the price for the license, the rental fee, and the loan value were set.

Because the term bond is a DEBT according to the legal lexicon from 1783. The collateral account is therefore not a credit from all of the above. 

It's a debt! 

A guilt that is imposed on people and through which they are enslaved until the end of their life. Since the sum is set very high, since you still have to work off the debts of your ancestors and all the royalties extracted - called taxes - are not covered, the descendants of the slaves automatically come back into slavery, debt bondage. Because bonds are connections.

Obligatio a connection or link/obligation/legal bond/by which we are compelled/to perform or pay something.

Lemke Legal Obligation
Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721

“Obligation is the prescription by which someone undertakes to pay the debt owed to another. These can be issued by all people who can associate according to the rights, but not minors and others.”

Wiesand Bond 01 Min
Wiesand Bond 02 Min
Wiesand Bond 03 Min
Wiesand - Legal Handbook of German Rights 1762

Obligatio is also the name of a bond...

Lemke, Johann Friedrich Wilhelm - Legal Dictionary 1783
Lemke Legal Obligation Really Min

Thus, the people who are aware of the injustice of the system and go in search of how to escape from it all will sooner or later come across the Private Commercial who, like everything else in the exoteric world, mixes truth with lies. One turns the truth in the Luciferic system by 180° and then lets the people with the doctrine about the acceptance, once again walk so beautifully into the trap. As punishment quasi for the disobedience of the slave.


speaking of



Oberlaender Accept Min
Oberländer Samuel - Latin German Juridical Hand Lexicon 1721

Accepta sententia, an accepted/accepted verdict.

Acceptans, the one who accepts the bill elsewhere.

Acceptatio juramenti, the acceptance of the oath, is/when one actually offers oneself in a certain time for the deposition of the oath awarded and at the same time asks/that the opposing party be citied to it, then a certain date ad jurandum is set/at which/if both do not appear/the date is held pro circumducto/and therefore the one/who is interested in settling the matter/must at his own expense/extract another date/ but if only one appears/he must strive/that the other remaining out may be accused of disobedience/and so the oath may either be sworn or remitted/held.

Thus the current construct surrounding us and weaving itself into the system is slavery, serfdom with some form of fiefdom... As the worldly lord, the Pope as head of the Vatican thus does not have to worry about the administration in detail. That takes over for him the slave, who knows nothing about it that he is slave. So he can not revolt, as in ancient Rome.

Our everyday life situation also fits the description of serfdom excellently, which is what it is.

Hi 01 Min
Hi 02 Min
Hi 03 Min
Hi 04 Min
Hayme, Thomas - Old German Legal Dictionary 1738
Hi 05 Min
Feudal system Mayer Min
Mayer's Encyclopedia of Conversation

The Roman Empire, and Rome as a generic term for all the depravity, was unfortunately not defeated by the Germanic tribes (which, excitingly, is why you don't learn about it in history class.) But rather it remained in transformation and came through the back door. Slowly and steadily. And successfully put itself back in the saddle as the Roman law of justice that rides us to this day.

Suggenheim 1
Suggenheim 2
Suggenheim 3
Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861
Suggenheim 4

The clear aspiration of Germany at the time, was quite clearly the abolition of serfdom, which was never on a par with slavery anyway, as servants at least had certain rights.

So, once again, a problem was created and then the solution was offered, thus rebuilding the society of the people who had once been the victors over Rome.

Also, the church explicitly worked to establish and maintain serfdom.

Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19 century 1861
Suggenheim 5 Min
Suggenheim 6 Min
Suggenheim 7 Min
Suggenheim 8 Min
Suggenheim 9 min
Sugenheim, Samuel - Abolition of serfdom in Europe 19th century from the year 1861
Suggenheim 10 min

Quotation from a prize-writing crowned by the theological faculty of Munich:

Margrave Min
Margrave 2 Min
Margrave 3 Min
Margrave 4 Min
Josef Margraf - Church and Slavery since the Discovery of America, or What Has the Catholic Church Done Since the Discovery of America Partly to Mitigate and partly to Abolish Slavery? From the year 1865

If these lines have been approved by a theological faculty and have even won an award, then this can be regarded as an absolute confirmation of the church and as the truth confirmed by it.

The freedom of each has as its logical limits, the freedom of others.

In order to be truly free in this world with its system, one must discard the borrowed person and cancel the contracts.

It is hereby noted that all rights are reserved to everything found on this site and subject to the order of the Decided Terms of Ama-gi koru-E Kininigen. If someone distributes our knowledge, it would be honorable if he also names the source of this knowledge, which was not to be found anywhere else, and does not bring it as his own knowledge into the world to enrich his status with it.

Otherwise, we are grateful for the distribution of this knowledge, in the sense of every being.