Other views
In the posts about "the collateral account is a debt" I have already tried to prove that we are slaves/servants without knowing it.
We stray our whole life, through our life - or rather caught in the hamster wheel and do not understand what is going on until death.
It is an open secret that the vehicle registration certificate does not provide proof of ownership. But how does it work with the real estate?
The house we may have, what we or our parents and/or grandparents have worked for all their lives?
Maybe they even participated in the last equalization of burdens after the Second World War. When they were simply registered a debt, so that further money could flow to the Allies. Unasked had to pay off.
How's it going there?
I summarize it here for the impatient reader of the present time and if he understands it and/or is interested, he can read further. Then everyone can decide at the beginning whether he finds this elaborated "foundation too old and too poor" and whether he wants to read on. One can teach information, but unfortunately for this also the combination gift is needed, so that one can put together from the available foundation, a total picture. And this is missing in a striking way nowadays most.
One goes to the notary and by presenting the identity card, one confirms that one is acting for the person there and assigns all rights.
Leaving the supposedly own property, giving freely and renouncing it.
The notary acts as the representative of the operating system and takes the ownerless thing and thus secures all rights, this is legitimate on the basis of Roman law and to be done so.
That is why you always get only a copy and never the original - because it remains with the new owner - the notary.
The new owner, representing the operating system - which, after all, grants the license to the notary to do what he does, fortunately, yes, has the new interested party brought by the former owner (who supposedly thought he was the owner), to whom the right of possession (not the right of ownership) is granted as a fief.He therefore only holds the right of use.
That's why you pay the annual rent for use - aka property tax.
That's why it's possible to put burden equalization on it, that's why the system can expropriate you if it decides to build a road there, that's why they can say what kind of house can be built there and what trees can be planted and whether a garden shed can be on it or not.
Therefore, the contracting party of the operating system - the POLICE, may invade the house standing on the feudal estate, if necessary.
Because it does not belong to you!
You are only the authorized users, the borrowers.
When a property changes hands, it is a mandatory requirement that the contract between the buyer and seller be executed at and before a notary public.
Seit 2018 wurden offiziell das Notarwesen und Grundbuchwesen umgestellt und die letzten Reste der angeblich “staatlichen” Notare abgeschafft. Alle Notare sind privat, obgleich sie uns eine gewisse “Staatlichkeit” weiterhin vorgaukeln. Deception in war and under Roman law is allowed and this system is definitely at war with all living things.
Notaries represent in this process a Judgebefore which the whole thing must be notarized. It is mandatory that a conveyance must be made.
But what is a conveyance? Such a funny word...
Resignation: as Resignatio judicialis, Ivestitura judicialis means abandonment, renunciation, termination of the fief, feudal assignment, recut or resign the fief. The act where either the feudal lord takes back the feud or the vassal returns it, as well as the vassal's power to return the feud to the feudal lord. The resignation originates from the feudal law (refutare feudum).
The transfer of ownership, as a judicial conveyance as resignatio iudicalis, before the notary as vicarious agent, represents a waiver of all rights, which allows the notary/judge an occupatio, by res nullius cedit primo occupanti; abandoned and ownerless goods automatically fall to the "master". Thus, the Roman and still valid law.
Occupatio: Taking possession of, taking ownership of, taking over, taking possession of, taking control of, taking hold of, taking over a thing that is ownerless,
with the intention of keeping them for themselves.
res nullius: nobody's property, ownerless property, property free of ownership, in nobody's possession.
res nullius cedit primo occupanti: the ownerless thing belongs to the first owner of the same.
This circumstance is then made as a subsequent entry in the debt book Catastrum.
Claudius, Georg Carl - Advisor business affairs
Catastra, tax stops, aestima.
They are registers that contain the property and assets of subjects and at the same time estimate them. They have a perfect fidelity and prove completely if they are properly made.
Wiesand, G.S. Legal Handbook 1762
Catastrum, tax book; tax register of taxable persons, estates, fields, etc.
Kuppermann, Heinrich - Dictionary of Law 1792
Jütting, Wübbe Ulrichs –
1884
The cadastre - tax or stock book, tax register, late lat. catastrum, ital. catastro, is probably contracted with reference to catalog from a presupposed mlta. the capitastrum, which is formed from caput = head, thus the head tax list will have meant.
Thus, the previous feudal lord cancels his fief. He leaves it and gives it back to the vassal. (In principle, vassals were the kings or knights who rendered their services in conquests by doing what their lord ordered them to do. By the way, vassals are those with the Allod. One of the many many misdirections in controlled movements).
One gives up thus its possession, for which one pays the land tax as fee for the use, renounces all rights. The judge / notary, takes this ownerless property, as the vassal and then leases it further.
If you are horrified now, then rightly so. This is Pandora's box open. Get out your notary contract, is it an original? Or only a copy? As the supposed owner, shouldn't you have the original? Do your research... None of what you thought was yours is really yours. If it really belonged to us, we wouldn't have to pay property taxes, plant and build what we want on the property without getting permission for every peep beforehand.
We have been deceived for thousands of years. And now it is time for it to stop.
They know that and that's why this speed with which World Economic Forum und deren Leitsatz für die Sklaven “Du wirst nichts besitzen und du wirst glücklich dabei sein.”
Because they know that their previous system will fly up. Among other things, to cushion this, the new, genetically modified, transhumanist human is created, which is patented as a new thing, which is to possess nothing in the propagated green way. They have used the previous system to achieve their goal, to create the technology around transhumanism. Now that it is done, there is no need for so many of the slaves and the cover-up tactics that they knew would be exposed.
Ownership, dominium, proprietas.
§. 1 . Declaration
The right to dispose of a thing as one pleases, to enjoy its benefits, to exclude others from its use, and to reclaim it if it has been stolen. It takes place not only in corporeal, but also in incorporeal things.
§. 2 . Different genera
One shares the ownership
1) into the preferential (eminens) and the common (vulgare). The former belongs to the sovereign in the estates of the subjects; the latter to the subjects. One includes the right to restrict the freedom of the owners for the purposes of the state, even to use it in case of need, e.g. when a city is besieged, to tear down the suburbs for the preservation of the city, to impose extraordinary taxes in time of war, and the like.
2) Into state and private property. By virtue of the first, everything that has no master belongs to the lord of the country, e.g. B. Islands that arise in rivers, inheritance without heirs, abandoned apartments and fields, metals, treasures, etc.
3) Into the limited and unlimited. In Germany, ownership is very restricted. You can't change something to suit your taste. It is not allowed to fortify a house with walls.
The freedom to sell something is also extremely restricted. Goods that have been together for a long time should not be separated. Immovable property should never be moved, exchanged, given away or sold without the prior knowledge and approval of the authorities.
§ . 4. How ownership is acquired
Some ways of acquiring property are founded in nature and international law, but others arose in republics. One of the first is this Taking possession of things that were never owned (occupatio). This includes hunting, which today belongs to regalia. We have the Principle accepted: everything that has never had a master or has become ownerless belongs to the sovereign. Caffiodor. L. 6th Var. 8. Consequently, fishing and bird catching can be carried out by private individuals only if permitted by the superior. Regarding the things taken from the enemy, we follow the rule: What the soldier takes from the enemy belongs to the person in whose pay and service he is. Our ancestors, who often used the non-quarrelsome ones, thought completely differently. Pomponius Mela de fitu orb . L. 3. c . 3. Wer etwas findet, das ein anderer verloren, muß solche dem Besitzer wiedergeben, oder wenn selbiger nicht ausfindig zu machen, der Obrigkeit überliefern. L. Longobard . 1, 25, 1. L. Burgund. addit . 1 , 8. sächs. L. X. L. 2 , 37. Der Zuwachs, was durch selbst die Natur eine Sache vermehrt, gehört mit zu dem Eigentum. So eignet sich der Fürst die in einem Flusse entstandenen Inseln zu. Gryphiander de insul. c . 11. n . 61. Bekommt eine Sache durch die Kunst der Menschen einen Zuwachs, so sind folgende Regeln zu merken: 1) Sachen, die von einander zu trennen sind ohne sie zu verletzen, müssen getrennt werden, als wenn jemand sein Degengehäng an des “andern Degen geknüpffet hat, in diesem Fall bekommt ein Jeder das seinige. 2) Können sie nicht getrennt werden, so zieht die Kostbare die Geringe an sich, doch so, das der Wert der Geringern bezahlt werde. Wir setzen den Fall, es habe jemand einen Contract auf 20 Bogen Papier, die uns gehören, beschrieben, so ist zwar das Papier sein, nur muß er dessen Wert ersetzen. Die Deutschen folgen hierinnen den Lehrsätzen der Billigkeit. So, wenn jemand des andern Feld besäet, so wird er die Ernte nehmen können, wenn er dem Eigentümer des Felder den hierdurch entzogenen Nutzen ersetzet. Sie lieben nicht unnütze Spitzfindigkeiten. Daher beurteilen sie das Eigentum des Baumes aus dem Stamm und Zweigen, welche der Augenschein beweiset, nicht aber aus den öfters sehr verborgenen Wurzeln. eichs. L. R. L. 2 , 92. Weichbild art. 125 . Würnburg . Reformat. T. 26 , 14. Die Übergabe geschieht mit verschiedenen Zeichen oder im Beisein gewisser Augenzeugen . Zu den bürgerlichen Arten ein Eigentum in Deutschland zu bekommen, gehöret die Verjährung, Belehnung, Erbschaft und andere wovon wir besonders handeln wollen.
Ownership, according to “German law” as the operating system sees it, simply means the right to rule over an asset . This interpretation and view of property rights represents expropriation and robbery.
Quote: [Wikipedia
“ According to German law, property is a right to control an asset . For private law, Section 903 of the Civil Code (BGB) defines property as the control of a person over a thing. According to this, the owner can handle the item as he wishes and exclude others from any influence, unless the law or the rights of third parties conflict with it. The protection of Article 14 GG refers exclusively to individual assets. The assets in their entirety are therefore not protected.”]
1885
This does not exclude the possibility that civil law effects may be linked to a public law act in the broader context. But then it is not a question of two different parts of an act, in which the subject's action would be judged in two ways, but of new relationships of the same thing or of relationships of others.
We differentiate between the following cases:
1. The public rights established in the form of the public law legal institution can subsequently be transformed into the corresponding civil law rights through changes that occur: Public property, for example, becomes the property of the state through transfer to private ownership.
2. The effect of the public law institute can immediately change to civil law for newly considered relationships. This is almost regularly the case when establishing legal power over physical things: expropriation, confiscation, voluntary or forced payment
1803
Hellbach, Johann Christian von - Dictionary of feudal law
Terminate, abandon, uplet: refute the loan, resign
Abandonment: see abandonment, termination
To give up the loan, as much as to give up.
Refutatio = Refutare feudum 1) cede the usufruct of the fief to the feudal lord.
Refutation of the fee – s. Aufkündigung
Annunciation of the fief: Abandonment, Lens assignment, Lensaufendung, re-termination of the fief, Refutatio, Rennociatio, Resignatio: 1) is the act where either the feudal lord takes back the fief or the vassal gives it back, 2) authority of the vassal, that To give the fief back to the feudal lord.
1762
abandonment, abandonment:
It is as much as giving up one's property in a solemn manner and legally handing it over to someone else. Judicial release has been accepted in the sale of certain items so that 1) all disputes were prevented, 2) the consent of those who have any right to the item was thereby confirmed, 3) the contract was thereby insured and all claims again would be fortified, 4) the right of the superior would be retained, but immovable property would be transferred to worthy persons. Hence the saying that the fief was abandoned and the property was left to the buyer by the authorities. Beyer L.I.C. 19, 10
2 Different laws
...without the leaves of the heirs and without judgment, no man can forgive his own property or his people. The newer Dec. Electoral. 61. requires abandonment in all properties without distinction.
... but all purchase contracts for immovable goods must be brought into court, and until such a thing has happened, and the sold goods must be handed over to the buyer by the court, the property must not be transferred to the buyer, nor the buyer recognized as the lord of the property.
It is well known that in Saxony, when handing over immovable property, people use the saying that gives up fief, or takes the property in fief, allows the authorities to hand it to you in fief. In this way, one wants to grant the sovereign ownership of the sovereign, since the subject exercises all the rights associated with the property, but is nevertheless bound to certain limits and purposes, the provision of which is the responsibility of the sovereign.... Write about the necessary mortgage in the case of heirlooms. one should take all inherited goods and houses into fiefdom before the council or treasured things bank
1750
Weber, Immanuel - Dissertatio Jvridica, De Refvtatione Fevdorvm Imperii
Feudum refutare
A revocation, assignment, cancellation, abandonment, abandonment of the fief.
The feudal man may leave it to the master and renounce him
If a man wants to give up his fiefdom to his master and no longer wants to be of the master, the master has no right to refuse.
The judicial abandonment or the judicial abandonment, surrender, or renunciation.
1762
Tax, Tax Justice
1) The sovereign's assets, his chamber goods.
2) Goods which the sovereign or the authority takes away from the subject property of the superior property. It actually belongs to the sovereign and is generally considered one of the lesser regalia.
1803
Kraft, Sebastian Adam - practical legal dictionary
Resignatio iudicialis: judicial abandonment, abandonment, renunciation, official declaration by the owner of an immovable property that he is transferring his property to a specific other person
Desertio: Abandonment, abandonment, extinction, neglect of rights.
Derelicta, tum: abandoned, abandoned, ownerless things. Abandoned, dispossessed property that has no owner. Goodwill abandoned property
Derelicta, tum ctio: abandonment, abandonment of possession or property.
Why was a reorganization of the notarial system in Baden-Württemberg necessary?
As in the land registry system, the notaries pointed out Baden-Württemberg a historically grown structure that no longer existed anywhere else in Germany and Europe. And just as in the land register area, there were also completely different structures in the notarial system between the parts of Baden and Württemberg. In the Baden part of the country There were the so-called judge notaries, these were fully qualified lawyers in the national service. In the Württemberg part of the country, so-called district notaries worked in a special career that was classified as a senior service. A number of freelance notaries have also been added so far.
As of January 1, 2018, all of the approximately 300 state notaries' offices were closed, so that notarizations are now carried out exclusively by freelance notaries.
Notaries who previously worked in the state service could, upon their request, switch from the state service to the status of an independent notary to carry out their duties full-time.
The procedures of voluntary jurisdiction will be carried out by the local courts from the effective date, as in the rest of the federal government.
The aim of the notarial reform is that from January 1, 2018, all notarial tasks in Baden-Württemberg - as in the rest of Germany - will be carried out by independent notaries. There will then no longer be state notary offices.
Reminder. The Pope, as head of the Vatican to the outside world (the ones in the background we never get to see) came first declared the world and all its living beings to be his own. He proclaimed, no one contradicted, objected, rejected - whatever. So it was valid.
He then explained all newborn, living, spiritually moral rational beings – at that time still known as man, as his property. He proclaimed, no one contradicted, objected, rejected - whatever. So it was valid.
Then the body, which the living, spiritually moral rational being inhabited during its stay in the density of matter, so that automatically, everyone born belonged completely to the Vatican and everything that stands behind it. Serfs. He proclaimed, no one contradicted, objected, rejected - whatever. So it was valid.
In the end it was everyone's soul. It didn't matter what religion you belonged to, after all you were born on earth and a slave anyway. He proclaimed, no one contradicted, objected, rejected - whatever. So it was valid. Simple basics of Roman (in)law. Silence is consent. Consent and acceptance are presumed.
But how do we get into debt bondage? Just because we are children of slaves, since our parents and grandparents, etc., are already slaves? Hasn't slavery been outlawed? Theoretically, yes. But as we are taught even in the slave training school, called school? Silence is consent and this is exactly how it is practiced in the system.
We remember, after Roman law, which is the twin of Canon Law - both built on oppression, slaves cannot own anything. Everything they work for belongs to the Lord – the owner. Descendants of slaves are automatically slaves.
Abgesehen davon stehen sowieso alle, selbst die Nachkommen des “Vaters” unter der “väterlichen Gewalt” – manus. Und als was gilt der Pope? – Dad – father of all. At least that's how he would like it to be, and he has taken the right to do so.
Bible revelation:
And he brought me in the spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet-colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and overlaid with gold, and precious stones, and pearls, and had in her hand a golden cup, full of the abomination and uncleanness of her fornication, and on her forehead was written a name, a mystery: Babylon the great, she Mother of fornication and all abominations on earth.…
“Die väterliche Gewalt ist diejenige, welche den Eltern über ihre Kinder, oder den Groß-Eltern über ihre Enkel zuständig, vermöge welcher sie völlige Regierung ihrer Person, und unumschränkte Verwaltung ihres Vermögens haben.”
In Roman law is the person, the legal capacity, the status. There are several levels of this. No Person – No legal capacity, no rights whatsoever. Slaves are subject to the maximum reduction in status = Capitis deminutio Maxima. Marked by the Name spelling in capitals. (Just look at your ID card, passport or the last love letter from the tax office - all in capital letters).
Because we therefore have a threefold status: statum libertatis, civitatis and familiae, it also follows that the deminutio must be different. So one divides the capitis deminutionem into maximam, mediam and minmam. Maxima capitis deminutio is when one is omnem statum, both civitatis, as well as livertatis and familiae loses. This happened to the Romans when someone was condemned ad bestias, or to the fire, as well as to the mines. For in this case, as has already been reported in Titus 12, such a condemned delinquent lost his freedom and rather became a servus poenae... that is, today, those who are sentenced to death or else… sent to the colonies, like those who were condemned on your galleys….
Then there are the capitis deminutio media and the minima. Nowadays everything can be assigned to the personal bond that we are forced to manage. I could write for several hours about this, in my opinion, sick system. There are many different statuses among the Romans. The famous pyramidal structure that the lodges also use, where in the end a small minority rules over everything. The Vatican, as the whore of Babylon mentioned in the Bible, but also only as the manager externally, in the visible, on the material level of this world.
Now, of course, it's quite tiring when you want to have the whole earth but, God forbid, have to "work" it yourself.
In this way, two birds were killed with one stone: the lawless slaves, who couldn't have anything anyway and obeyed the command "be fruitful and multiply" in order to produce more natural fruits and gave them the use of the land that they had to cultivate thus financing the golden palaces of the innocence-loving, water-preaching, wine-drinking old men in long dresses and all their dark preferences.
So we were officially declared slaves around 1455, it sat unchallenged for a while and became common law. Silence is consent in this system.
Slaves cannot own anything, everything they own belongs to their master. You have no status (Person as legal capacity) So when you register at the registry office, you will be given a license to use what is called the birth certificate (of the person).
The use of the person provided to us creates a prior calculated debt, the collateral account, which functions as an independent trust - without a beneficiary (everything belongs to whoever controls the Vatican as earth manager anyway).
Children of slaves are automatically slaves themselves. Born unfree and things (res – hence also res judica). They then essentially inherit their parents' slave account. If we do something wrong (in the eyes of the system), something will be added as a punishment. The goal is to keep us in slavery forever.
This is called Lehn. Like in the post this Roman injustice executed, this system and those behind it are anything but stupid... they were aware that open control of the increasing number of slaves would be much more difficult. So the boundaries were gradually blurred and people were made to forget. The slaves became serfs, became servants and later became citizens. Ostensibly enjoying more rights. They transformed the system of open slavery into a complex, hidden and less clear one within centuries. Shaped according to your wishes.
???
Blaschke, Johann
Lectures on fief law
Concept of fiefdom and its essential characteristics
Fiefdom (feudum) means a thing whose ownership is divided in such a way that the upper ownership of it belongs to one person and the usable property belongs to another person under the obligation of mutual, special loyalty.
The person who has ultimate ownership of such a thing is called the feudal lord, while the person who has the usable ownership is called the vassal
“Allodifikation, der Fall der sogenannten Lehnsappropriation (Übergang der Rechte des Lehnsherrn auf den Vasallen), in which the feudal lord gives the vassal das Lehnsgut zum vollen Eigenthum überträgt. Durch die Allodifikation können die Rechte des Agnaten nicht verletzt werden, vielmehr erneuern sie sich dabei zu der Form fideikommissarischer Successionsrechte.”
“Die Allodifikation kann übrigens, rechtlich betrachtet, nur dann eintreten, wenn außer dem Vasallen Mangel an berechtigten Personen oder wenn deren Einwilligung erfolgt ist. Sie pflegt gegen Eintrichtung eines Abfindungsquantums oder eines annual canon, der sich nach der Anschlagsumme des Guts richtet, zu geschehen.”
All rights fully reserved at all times.
It is hereby noted that all rights to everything listed herein are fully reserved at all times.
Alles was auf dieser Seite zu finden ist, unterliegt der Ordnung der Dezidierten Vertragsbedingungen von Ama-gi koru-É Kininigen. Wenn jemand unser Wissen verteilt, so wäre es ehrenvoll wenn er auch die Quelle dieses Wissens, welches sonst bisher nirgendwo zu finden war, nennt und es nicht als seine eigene Erkenntnis in die Welt bringt, um seinen Status damit zu bereichern. Nur weil etwas von uns online gestellt wurde, bedeutet es nicht, dass es kopiert und ego- oder gewinnorientiert genutzt werden darf. Dieses Wissen soll der “Menschheit” dienen und nicht von Einzellgruppen zerfleddert werden. Es ist ausdrücklich verboten, dieses Wissen zur persönlichen Bereicherung zu nutzen.
Actions from base motives will have energetic consequences and consequences.
Otherwise, we are grateful for the distribution of this knowledge in the interests of every being. For the highest good of all beings.