Allod movement

Allod Zygote the heresy

The world from a different perspective

Kininigen Blog

Allod or The world of the small Single celled

This time turn we join a doctrine, which has been propagated more and more loudly in commercial circles for some time.

First of all, of course, I would like to say that I respect and honor everyone who is looking for a way out of this madhouse with true intentions and a pure heart. I don't think there's any other way to say it...

Two years ago, I already about this issue, discussed with a smart man, but he couldn't hear my words because he said I was like behind a wall of clouds for him with the things I said.

At that time I would never have thought that there would be so many followers of this teaching.

 

Addendum and update 01.04.2021:
The article has been online less than 10 hours and we're already getting the wildest reactions to it.
The aim of these words is not to offend anyone, but to point something out.
Those for whom these words trigger these reactions should go into themselves and ask themselves Why they react like that to what's written? What is it that is responding?

If all of this written here is bunk, then why this violent reaction that is being triggered?
We are all here in a construct designed to deceive the incarnated into remaining in this illusion.

I know the deception and the admission of being deceived hurts. But there is no fault in oneself to have been deceived.

It is strength of character to admit and correct your mistake and also part of the journey.
If there are errors in my words, I would like to ask for evidence as to what is wrong with the statements. Otherwise, all I can say is that we, the free organic beings, are here to find a solution together so that we can be completely free again.

First of all, I would like to ask the reader to forgive my sarcasm, which is now and then very clearly evident in this article. However, my tolerance limit for movements that, according to my knowledge, harm living, spiritually moral, rational beings is now very low.

Firstly because the world is full of them and secondly because time is becoming increasingly scarce. And when I see these creatures marching towards an abyss like lemmings, it's hard for me to hold back.

This movement has some correct elements, but a few key points where it actually does more harm than good to the people who use it. My hope is that the “why” will become clear to the dear reader of these lines at the end of the article.

I ask you to examine my words and to use the valuable gift of understanding and discernment that each of us is entitled to and form your own picture.

The world is full of deception. She lives on that. Therefore, it is best to always question everything and always read all information with “gut feeling”. 

"No man is free who is not master of himself."

Mattihas Claudius

In commerce, which we already know to be a subverted doctrine... enttarnt There is a group that belongs to the theory of single-celled organisms. It's about the allod, which then refers to the zygote, as "the smallest material fact of incarnation", to conception and fertilization - NOT to conception, as a claim is made.

Because this is supposedly “a red line for the snake” that it cannot go beyond because it says “what the great Creator (? the English term Creator was probably Germanized untranslated) created, I cannot reach it as a snake “, because conception/fertilization is a divine act.

However, why one is supposedly divine and the following is not is not explained.

This single cell, the zygote, is... supposedly the "one true beginning."

So, dear reader, we are going at full speed on a journey of reducing the being endowed with divine power and incarnated as [human] and down into the fleshly, matter of the 3D level.

Through the act of birth, the snake can then supposedly lay claim to my genetic material because I left behind the afterbirth, the placenta.

This doctrine of the allod and the zygote was founded, as far as I know, by Kurtis Kallenbach - he is, so to speak, the head unicellularist of the unicellular fraction.

Now… What is the zygote. To do this, let’s take the “good” Wikipedia again and read what the mainstream says about it.

Allod

"

Opinion mainstream

Quote from

Wikipedia

 

“A zygote is one eukaryotic diploid Cell used in sexual reproduction by merging two haploid gametes (Gametes) arises - mostly from a Egg (female) and a Sperm (male). This union of the gametes, which also involves the two Nuclei merge with each other (Karyogamy), is referred to as Insemination. From the zygote develops in most living beings through multiple mitotic cell divisions, a diploid organism emerges. In the further course - sooner or later - occurs in some cells through Meiosis the transition from the diploid to the haploid state, in which gametes are finally formed again.”

Allod and zygote father Kurtis Kallenbach

Kurtis Kallenbach refers in his Allod teaching to the Golden Section and the Fibonacci sequence, the divine act of creation of conception. That may be all and after this pattern, the matrix of this world, in which we are here on the 3D plane, is also built so. AEverything in it, including the zygote and every radish and everything else that the flora and fauna has to offer, is subject to this mathematical structure. But the numerical codes and the “holy” cut are nothing other than building instructions for the matrix – the matrix that holds us captive.

Like the construction manual of a car or the architectural plan of a house.

Nothing more, nothing less. There is therefore no reason to proclaim oneself as part of a blueprint just because the eternal consciousness has decided or is forced to remain in the model that follows this blueprint.

So if we look at this clearly and relate the statement of the unicellular/zygote faction, it is like a car buyer pleading that he is the car.

He reduces himself to a material object, which he later takes possession of, firmly believing that he is this collection of material atoms just because he decided to drive it for a while.

So let’s continue with our example.

A zygote is comparable to the first screw and nut that are put together and form a connection from which a complete vehicle is gradually created, which the buyer, the later owner/possessor - (just like the consciousness, it with the soul and can do to the body) can test sit. He can also theoretically test drive it without it being painted or without the windows in it and get out again until the vehicle is finished (just as happens with the physical body through consciousness before birth).

But if at some point now the car buyer stands up and says I am the car because I own (occupy) it, then in normal life he would be diagnosed with a mental disorder. Because just because he drives it for a while, and then leaves, doesn't make him the car.

In various religions, the date of entry of the soul is considered to be on the body, an approximately 40 day period after the zygote/fertilization. Which is also consistent, since the same time period applies to death. According to legends, a soul remains on the body for 40 days until it completely leaves the 3D plane.

However, this factor is irrelevant for the existence of things. A material cell arises IN time, it acts and works according to the rules that prevail here, on 3D - the fact that the consciousness with the soul is not subject to the time that prevails here makes no difference for the soul or for the cell. The cell goes its way of development and the consciousness watches it, tries out the product of its development and accepts it... or not - which then leads to the abortion if the consciousness with the soul, for some reason, does not incarnated.

The same is true with the zygote. It is the laying of the foundation stone of a house that consciousness will later inhabit for a while. After a certain time, the soul - the container of eternal and perfect consciousness, as a part of the highest source of all existence, leaves this house. This material container, which filled her with life for a period of time, will at some point go to another house in which she will then live again for a while.

A free-thinking person does not stop where chance pushes him.

Heinrich von Kleist

The zygote, strictly speaking, does not even belong to the consciousness that is making a journey here through the soul and which we are. For this plane in which we find ourselves is subject to a dominion of beings with whom we enter into contracts to be here. Contracts of use. Whether this domination is legitimate or not is another issue.

So on their level we get a vehicle that is called a body (if animated or body/corpus if the consciousness and soul have left it) and in which we move on a 3D installed system. We use it and, through the creations of our minds and the drawing of energy from within ourselves, pay the price for this good, which we are allowed to use down here, according to the contracts concluded.

The Allod movement asks the question: “Who do I belong to? Do I belong to myself?”

You can only ask this question if you believe that you yourself are the matter. Because it would be important to define beforehand what this “I” is.

I, for example, can only say what I am, and most likely you, dear reader of these lines, are also the same (unless you belong to the other side, which is not completely organic, or connected to it by contracts):

I, am NOT my body.

I, am NOT matter.

I AM that I AM. The eternal perfect spark, the eternal consciousness, from the perfect Supreme Source of all being, as a part of it.

And just because I dive into the depths of 3D matter and put on a diving suit in the shape of a body, I am NOT the diving suit itself.

I am and remain, this eternal, perfect spark of the original source. Who was simply made to forget what he really is down here so that his energy can be stolen from him.

So, if one thinks clearly and is aware that one is an eternal, perfect and immortal part of the Supreme Source of All Being, can one be a single-celled organism on the 3D material plane?

Can you reduce yourself like that?

It is everyone's free will to do it. Yes. However, the 3D plane has been manipulated and when a perfect portion of the Supreme Source is caused to reduce itself to something single-celled and shed its divinity, the following principle occurs:

 

"Thy will be done"

 

The being behind it, in the fervor of belief in it, gives up its power... and that is exactly the goal of the beings controlling the matrix. Not just forgetting who and what we are, confusing. No. They want us to reduce ourselves and consider ourselves to be matter, unimportant and lowly.

In their explanation, the unicellular organisms say: “They are one with God and at the same time they say they're the one who Zygote."

They say you are the undivided one, because you cannot be undivided. As far as I know, our problem is not that we are divided, but rather that several people (masks) are put on us.

The explanation here is that the serpent offers us a second beginning - the date of birth.

And this is exactly where we get to the core of Pudel. THAT is exactly what happens to the zygote. A reversal happens again. The Serpent offers a second beginning! One that reduces consciousness to matter and takes away legal capacity.

The zygote date Sync and corrections by n17t01 the offer of the snake and to which the "snake" can then refer.

Offer and willing, implied acceptance of contract to discard actual divinity.

Of course, the system around us needs the date of birth. You need that Names and the date of birth. They work with it because they took it away from us, through the parents registering the baby with the office and booking the license to use the name.

Birth and time

Date of birth and the Time

The date of birth is nothing more than the marker on the timeline of the exit from the mother's womb.

A date of birth based on the date of the zygote - as fertilization, is not possible.

A zygote is not and cannot be a birth.

A zygote is the coming together of two physical blueprints into one.

Nothing else.

Birth is clearly defined as the exit from the mother's womb living and viable being. No fertilization, no conception.

A birth is a birth.

Note: The following picture credits of the sources, were taken from old encyclopedias and books. Since very many can no longer read the old German script, I have taken the trouble and typed them. And in fact in exactly the spelling, which was led in the book in the original to preserve the authenticity.

This note is intended as an instruction manual, so to speak, regarding reports of “weird spelling” or “spelling errors” contained therein.

Mayer's Conversation Lexicon Birth min

“Birth – the function of the female body whereby the fruit and its associated parts are expelled from the mother’s womb by means of certain natural forces.”

Mayer's Encyclopedia of Conversation

1876
Zedler, Johann Heinrich - Large Complete Universal Encyclopedia 1732
Zedler Universal Lexicon 1747 Birth min
Koebler Gerhard birth2 min
Dictionary Köbler Gerhard

Source: Germanic dictionary and the Gothic dictionary to a new unit for the time before 500, with 17742 approaches.

*burdi-, *burdiz, germ., st. m. (i), st. f. (i): nhd. carrying (N.), birth; ne. pregnancy, birth; RB.: an., ae., afries., as., ahd.; Vw.: s. *ga-; E.: s. idg. *bʰer- (1), V., to carry, bring, Pokorny 128; W.: an. bur-ð-r, st. m. (i), burden, birth, offspring; W.: ae. byr-d (1), st. F. (i), st. N. (a), birth; W.: afries. berd-e* (1) 30, berth-e (1), F., birth, fruit; W.: afries. ber-th-e (2) 11, ber-d-e (2), st. F. (i), burden, load; W.: as. *bur-d?, st. F. (i); W.: ahd. burt* (1) 2, st. F. (i), shape, being, birth; mhd. burt, F., descent, birth, the born; fnhd. burt, F., birth, DW 2, 552; L.: Falk/Torp 261, Seebold 105, EWAhd 2, 472 *burþi-, *burþiz, germ. st. f. (i): nhd. borne, birth, child; ne. birth, child; RB.: got., an., ae.; E.: cf. idg. *bʰer- (1), v., to carry, bring, Pokorny 128; w.: got. *baúr-þ-s (2), st. f. (i); W.: an. byr-ð, st. f. (i), birth, sex, status; W.: ae. beor-þor, st. n. (a), birth, child; L.: Seebold 105. *gaburdi-, *gaburdiz, germ. st. m. (i), st. f. (i): nhd. to bear, birth; ne. birth; RB.: ae., as, ahd.; E.: s. *ga-, *burdi-; W.: ae. ge-byr-d (1), st. F. (i), st. N. (a), birth; W.: as. gi-bur-d 7, st. F. (i), birth, origin; mnd. gebort, birth, F., N.?, birth; W.: ahd. giburt (1) 143, st. F. (i), birth, generation, creation, origination; mhd. geburt, st. F., birth, delivery, born, offspring; nhd. birth, F., birth, giving birth, being born, DW 4, 1902; L.: Seebold 105, Kluge s. u. Geburt"

The allod is then passionately referred to. In the belief that the beings and their operating hand on 3D: the Vatican, would leave something unoccupied here. The Vatican explainedas already mentioned in the article The collateral account is a debt and not a credit balancealready centuries ago everything to his possession. It is claimed that in daily life everything is maritime and commercial law, that you only have to go back to land law.

Well... EVERYTHING, just about everything that (was) to be found here on Gaia was occupied - including the land.

Does anyone seriously believe, in view of the perfection in which the system surrounding us has been worked out - and it has been brought with us here to this planet, that a law of the land has been overlooked?

Really Now?

The Germanic word Alod

Allod

The Old Germanic word: Alod, denotes a lot, is closely related in meaning to the word: sors (sors barbarica), which we found again among the Germanic peoples in the Roman provinces; and when we find Alod again as the designation of perfect property, which exerted the greatest influence on the difference between free and non-free people, this already indicates that that word itself, like the difference between free and non-free people, is only a consequence of conquest.

Allod, Zygote

Jacob Venedey in his book “Romanism and Germanism Reshaping Slavery” 1840

Allod

“Allodium from the Old German Od, Good and All) originally a common good or people's good, i.e. a good which was handed over to the individual citizen by the entire national community and is owned by the individual citizen with certain rights and obligations according to popular law...”

Allod

“The Germanic peoples distributed or raffled off the land of the countries they had conquered and taken possession of among their free men. The leaders and kings received larger shares, the other freemen smaller shares..."

 

Mayer's Encyclopedia of Conversation

1876
Allodification Mayer's conv. Lex 1 min

“Allodification, the case of the so-called feudal appropriation (transfer of the rights of the feudal lord to the vassal), in which the feudal lord gives the vassal transfers the fiefdom to full ownership. Through allodification, the rights of the agnate cannot be violated; rather, they are renewed into the form of fideicommissary rights of succession.”

Allodification Mayer's Conv. Lex 2

“Incidentally, from a legal point of view, allodification can only occur if there is a lack of authorized persons other than the vassal or if their consent has been given. It maintains against the establishment of a severance payment quantum or one annual canon, which depends on the amount of the asset, to happen.”

Mayer's Encyclopedia of Conversation

1876

Becoming a vassal doesn't sound particularly desirable.

Allode, Allodium, is an old German and Celtic word, which with them meant so much as a paternal hereditary estate.

Zedler, Johann Heinrich - Large Complete Universal Encyclopedia 1732
Allode Zedler min
Alod - Allod
Hübner, Johann - Hand dictionary 1825

Allodium, hereditary property free of feudal obligations and succession.

Right there is the magic word - it's REAL!

Roman law impresses me again and again in the respect that with those everything is defined most exactly. Even who can actually inherit. A zygote, however, according to Roman law and the exact definitions there, is nothing that can inherit. Thus also no allodization of something can take place.

GAccording to Roman law, only those who were born alive and fully developed - could make a sound and are capable of living - are capable of inheriting. Because without this precisely defined liveliness, there is no legal capacity.

Without legal capacity, there is no inheritance.

Because the ability to inherit falls under the legal capacity.

No ifs, ands, or buts.

Here follows some evidence.

There is a certain period of pregnancy before the expiration of which a live birth sometimes occurs, but in such a way that a child can live at most a few hours or days. Because of this incapacity to continue life for a longer period of time all legal capacity must be completely denied to it, even for the short time in which it actually lives.

Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 1 min

...A child may be born alive as early as the 182nd day after its conception....

Several passages of Roman law say quite definitely that in this state the child is not yet a human being, that it has no existence in itself, but is to be regarded only as a part of the mother's body.

Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 2 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 12 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 3 min

The beginning of natural legal capacity is conditioned by birth, that is, by the complete separation of a living human being from its mother.

Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 4 min

Only after this preparation is it possible to break down the above concept of true birth into its elements:

  1. Separation from the mother
  2. Complete separation
  3. Life of the born after complete separation
  4. Human nature of the same
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 5 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 6 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 7 min

These four conditions of natural legal capacity are the only ones that can be asserted under our positive law.

...that a child born alive but earlier than usual has no legal capacity if it dies immediately after birth....

... has its reason, and on the contrary, every child born alive must be ascribed full legal capacity....

Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 8 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 9 min

The natural beginning of legal capacity has been determined to be the time of completed birth.

... in that it can have neither property, nor claims, nor debts; since it is therefore not a person....

Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 10 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 11 min
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 13 min
Friedrich Carl von Savigny - History of Roman Law in the Middle Ages 1840
Legal capacity child Savigny Vol 2 S385 1840 14 min
Holzschuher BD 1 247 Human free being 02
Rudolf von Holzschuher - Theory and Casuistry of Common Civil Law Handbook for Practitioners 1857

3) What is required for an individual to be considered legally competent?

Being with human form, at least with human head, born of the female, by complete separation from the mother, brought to independent life.

Holzschuher BD 1 247 Monster Monster min

4) How is the concept of monstrum distinguished from what one is wont to call a freak?

Only a being created contra formam humani generis (monstrum) has no legal capacity....

Holzschuher BD 1 110 Human free being 2 min
Rudolf von Holzschuher - Theory and Casuistry of Common Civil Law e. Handbook for Practitioners 1857

5) In order to attribute legal capacity to the partus, is its vitality also required?

... denies legal capacity only to the abortus. The abortus, however, or the foetus displaced from the uterus by harmful influences before its maturity, is, in distinction from premature and precocious birth, such a foetus which, separated from the mother as immature, is not able to live at all.

Exactly the same as our zygote...

Holzschuher BD 1 250 Human free being 04 1 min
Matthiae, C. - Controversial Dictionary of Roman Law 1856
Legal ability Matthiae C. Controversies Lexicon of Roman Law 1856 min
Glueck Christian Friedrich 181 days min

Roman law now accepted, in favorem partus et matrimonii, the opinion of physicians and naturalists favorable to the woman and the child as the correct one, and based the law on it. It thus fixed the date of 182 days for the recognition of viable premature births. Every child born on and after the 182nd day since the wedding, which is born alive, is therefore considered a viable child. In the same way, every viable child who remains alive and is born after the 181st day and before the end of the tenth month is considered a premature child.

Rudolf von Holzschuher - Theory and Casuistry of Common Civil Law e. Handbook for Practitioners 1857

...reckoned from the time of the marriage, as having been produced in that marriage. These provisions must therefore apply as authoritative even now in all cases where inheritance rights, paternity, and the legitimacy of the child are to be decided....

...Therefore, if a woman gives birth to a viable, surviving child on the 182nd day after her marriage, it is considered a legitimate child by legal presumption....

The Prussian land law is quite different. It sets the shortest term at 210 days after the first married cohabitation, and discharges the child born on the 210th day after the marriage as legitimate....

 

...this is to be understood from the beginning of the seventh month, and as thirty days are reckoned for a month; so it takes 180 days for the earliest period from the birth to the birth of the child....

Human 181 days of happiness Christian Friedrich BD 28 p. 131 2 min
Rudolf von Holzschuher - Theory and Casuistry of Common Civil Law e. Handbook for Practitioners 1857
Human 181 days of happiness Christian Friedrich BD 28 s. 133 min
Rudolf von Holzschuher - Theory and Casuistry of Common Civil Law e. Handbook for Practitioners 1857

So when people refer to the date of the zygote, which is clearly NOT viable without leaving the mother's womb and which also does not make a sound canLet alone that it could ripen in the womb of the mother for 182 days, which is quite clearly a requirement that was put forward even by Hippocrates, those who claim to be allod zygotes can definitely not claim anything. Under Roman law., which is still undisputed to this day and is scrupulously observed by the system without telling us, these people are willingly depriving themselves of their inheritance.

Because what allod does someone want to claim when they are clearly unable to inherit anything AT ALL. In my opinion, the snake mentioned by the Allodians really comes into play here and through this act causes people to weave themselves even deeper into this material matrix, into this prison.

But back to Allod. There is no longer any fief-free land that can be inherited or inherited.

Apart from the fact that Slaves, whose status was assigned to us, cannot inherit anything anyway.

Thus, the action of the allod on Zygote is also just another Imkrice run. Again.

The Vatican exclaimed that the whole earth, everything on it, man, his body, his possessions and his soul, all of this belongs to him. Our system is based on the “silence is consent” principle. If I don't revoke/reject it, then it stands. For several hundred years.

And now please don't anyone come to me with the argument - "Yes then I also proclaim something and then it applies."

In the past, the Vatican has developed a different position for itself, as a little Hansel whose conceptual ability is not able to grasp the scope of this unchallenged proclamation, which is therefore still valid today. And whoever claims, "Roman law no longer applies to us...“I can only recommend studying ancient Roman law. You will be amazed at what is still exactly the same as it was back then.

I am sorry to be the bearer of this news.

But there is no longer any free land law for you to invoke.

All the laws and statutes or any rights. Forget it. None of this is in the interest of [man] and never has been.

We have been declared slaves by the Vatican and what keeps us in that slave status?

It's the name we use.

As long as we use the name we've thought of as our own all our lives...we remain the Vatican's declared serfs and slaves.

Also, the people who make the Allod Proclamation invoke that one is the Authorized representative of the name. Really now? From the name that is considered the property of the Vatican/the state to which one belongs and which is subject to its law. How does it work? When did the system give this authority to the being using the person behind it? Because the name doesn't belong to us, the system has copyrighted this name of the NP in the form of the birth certificate. So what copyright is being claimed and on what basis?

The Urhab and Urheb's hair-splitting is no longer of any use or the "I'm-from-now-connecting-everything-that-I-somehow-think-I-have-to-connect-with-hyphens-so-that-it-according-to-someone" Statement-becomes-true” tactic.

It will never save you the form or the knowledge of every word down to the smallest detail (which of course is really good, because words are magic with which we are manipulated), it is the attitude of the sovereign behind it and that he has recognized what he really is - i.e. not a single-celled organism that gives rise to a collection of further cells that begins in one cell. It is the termination of certain contracts and also the Soul contracts, which, whether we want it or not, influence us in our further incarnations. In addition, there are the burdens of ancestral lines, because out of love we take on tasks that are not ours. As I said, this system that is practiced here on Earth is very well thought out and effective. 

I don't like to judge, but after seeing a few such proclamations, it honestly no longer surprises me that so-called authorities who receive these confusing letters don't take anyone who comes from a similar background seriously and consider them crazy . People? Have you looked at your writing yourself? Because of all the capital letters, colons and hyphens, you don't even know where to look. Now to be honest, would you take something like that seriously? Have you never had any doubts?

 

Matthiae, C. - Controversial Dictionary of Roman Law 1856
Legal ability Matthiae C. Controversies Lexicon of Roman Law 1856 min

The placenta is also clearly not the property of the new person. It is a necessary component for pregnancy, from the mother. This was formed from her and her body, from the energy she absorbed and created, which she lovingly makes available to her offspring.

Through the act of birth, the snake can supposedly claim my genetic material because I left behind the afterbirth, the placenta, and therefore I have to claim the zygote, they say.

However, it is not quite right. The placenta consists not only of my genetic material, but also of the genetic material of the mother. Actually the genetic material mixes of the child even with the mother, consequently the allod would then also have to be extended to the mother? And what about the father's genetic makeup? Questions upon questions…

Quote:

“The placenta is not an organ of the mother, as the name might suggest. 98 percent of the placenta and egg membranes are fetal tissue and of child origin. Both placenta and embryo develop on the genetic basis of both parents. But while a wide variety of structures, different tissues and organs and especially interior spaces differentiate within the child, the placenta develops outside the child's body into a unified organ that is oriented towards its environment. As a quasi-universal organ, the placenta takes on a variety of functions: those of the lungs, kidneys, liver, endocrine glands, heat production and the child's digestive system - functions that the child's internal organs later fulfill. At the same time, the placenta acts as a mediator in this task - both connecting and separating - between the mother's and the child's organism. In doing so, it makes a crucial contribution to the success of the child’s development and growth.”

Here one could philosophize, which energy made it possible to create the placenta? The energy from and through the mother, forms the embryo and the shell, the placenta around it out of her body. So how can I claim that the placenta, which my mother's womb formed, belongs to me, when I did not create it, but it was created at the same time as me?

She and her energy created it, in her body, with her energy with the addition of the father's genetics. Isn't it more like the mother's property? Just because I lived in a house for a while doesn't automatically make it mine after ten months, just because I gave them the blueprint for it. But we don't want to get lost in it.

In allodiism, this circumstance is explained by the mother's unconsciousness because she did not make the claim.

,

Thibaut - System of the Pandecte Law 1823
Thibaut System of Pandect Law 1823 1 min
Thibaut System of Pandect Law 1823 2 min
Thibaut System of Pandect Law 1823 3 min
Thibaut - System of the Pandecte Law 1823
Thibaut System of Pandect Law 1823 4 min

 

 

Time.
Whose is it anyway?

Chronos/Saturn. The god who ate his children.

There is also the claim of time. Let it be our time, my time! This can often be heard in the arguments.

So. As already said, this level has been hijacked and with it the time that works in it. It is part of this level, part of this construct, part of this matrix, which is structured this way whether you like it or not.

You are just as subject to it as you are to gravity. It therefore belongs to the beings who currently rule over it. They “allow” us to use this time given to us in the contract, in the body, which is also based on the hijacked principles, since it consists of the hijacked substance of this matrix. Let us recall the example of the car again.

It's basically the rental car that we have contracted to take, drive it for a while and then leave it again at some point - to go on a trip. The contract duration was determined in advance. The price is our creative power and the energy generated - for 4D and so on - the life energy, for 3D - the plain money or other material things.

The allod/zygote approach is like (you'll notice I like to work with visual examples to help you understand) a house with a plot of land, on it a few cows, a dog, trees, shrubs, flowers..... imagine all of that as your imagination takes you.

After you've imagined it beautifully and colored it in with lots of detail, imagine...it's taken away from you.

This is the status we are all currently in our personal bondage to.

And so, according to the Allod/Zygote procedure. there and demands the door of the house and the cup with the pink flower back there in the kitchen cupboard. What about the rest? But at the same time you affirm your submissive covenant with the very being who took all this from you, or whose henchman was supposed to do it on his behalf.

The Allod followers say that claiming the hereditary property, is the simple thing that no one has thought of and done before. It isn't. We did that as Kininigen Sovereigns and even more.

And we are not only asking for the said "door and the cup". So only the hereditary property. No. We proclaim who and what we are and demand ALLES back - the entire property with everything on it (as far as possible on 3D) and overlapping to the other levels, our entire energetic belongings down to the smallest detail.

This is what distinguishes the way of Kininigen from the way of Allod, and this is the way of Kininigen.

Ah yes... the "dear" God and his covenant.

Dhe Bible lets something leak out every now and then. You could say the church overlooked this, but I think it's more because it was left standing on purpose. In order to preserve and apply the sacred cosmic law of free will, which these beings stretch beyond recognition, this passage was left standing.

Because that's how these beings can always relate to it, to the species:

“Hey, we told you! That’s what it said in “your holy” book all along! We can’t help it that you didn’t understand.”

This is the way they work.

 

MG 4914 7 min

"

Bible Quote

Gospel of Luke

Chapter 4

5 Then the devil brought him up (to a mountain), and showed him in a single moment all the kingdoms of the earth. 6 And he said to him, All the power and glory of these kingdoms will I give to thee; for they are left to me, and I give them to whom I will. 7 If thou wilt bow down thyself before me, and worship me, all shall be thine.

Has any reader of this chapter ever wondered how the devil could have made this offer to Jesus in the first place, unless this 3D world belongs to him?

HE is the God of this earth and plain.

Although he came to this rule through deception, he is still the ruler. For this reason the Catholic Church also eradicated the Gnostics. Because they clearly stated what or who the God is here.

Thus, if I, as an allodial claimant, refer in my expression of will to the covenant with this GodCALL, I legitimize this being and all of its contractual partners and vicarious agents for what they do here on earth and with me. It is then free will – manipulated, but still. In this way they avoid the consequences of their actions. The person who legitimizes it then takes over. Through implicit consent, you take on the “karmic” consequences for your actions, which you are doing here with us.

Through your free will, these beings get rid of the consequences that they would normally have had to bear themselves (at some point). This is how they work - and this is exactly what drives the teaching of karma and the eso scene with the motto “We are here to learn”. If you agree to this, then you have accepted its consequences. For “Thy will be done.”

Because to refer to the fact that one could not know that, you can not. It is even, as I said, quite openly readable in the Bible, the most printed and best-selling book in the world.

This is also the reason why we at Kininigen only refer to the highest source of all being and that Expression Do not use “God” and if you do, then only according to our definition, which excludes this being(s).

The Supreme Source of All Being, this is the true source of the perfect spark that we are. There is no being that the Gnostics called a freak, that lives here from the torment created because at some point it split off from the highest source of all being, no longer had access to this infinite energy and therefore needed another one. She and her entourage, or the races that were already enslaved and therefore worked for her, found this in us. And we are not the first planet or first race where they practice this. That's why they are so effective.

We are their source of energy from which they live (Disney's Monster AG illustrates it wonderfully, for example - here, too, no one can claim not to have known about it).

The stewards of this earth had woven everything tightly together. There was no way out. Until a new level opened. The Kininigen Plains. This has also been confirmed by various sources independently of each other, without knowledge of it, repeatedly since September 2020.

Clipboard01111 min

So dear reader, make your decision. Here we are at the end of this post and I apologize again for my passionate sarcasm or the spelling mistakes that I certainly slipped through.

We are all in a turning point. Everyone will have to decide which path and which timeline they will choose.

So make up your mind.

What do you want to be?

Remember that you are perfect and perfect, just as a part of the perfect and perfect, Highest Source of All Being, and now you are just spending a little while in the material, low density?

Recognize your true greatness and perfection and your inherent creative power?

Or a unicellular organism that is haunted by decay and bound to 3D, but which has its allod on it? Who is eternally condemned to not be able to leave the Samsara Wheel.

Who has an interest in so reducing the divine beings that inhabit the bodies here on 3D? Who is served by this train of thought? Who is served by this allod doctrine?

The Supreme Source of All Being and you and I, as a part of it, certainly do not.

So what do you want to be?

One cell or the perfect and immortal part of what you are that simply inhabits many cells sometime and somewhere?

Remember your origin and your true being.
 

Addendum and update 03.04.2021:

We now KNOW that the Allod movement, also at its root the “inventor” Kurtis Kallenbach, who received this information - knowingly or unknowingly - from a being who has the interest and goal of influencing the beings on earth in the To keep them captive and send them in the opposite direction to freedom.

You could say the snake - to stay with the terminology of this movement.

One picks up in this way, so to speak, the awakened and directs them and their energy and direction in the desired, channeled direction. Also, we are now aware of some extremely dishonorable things that have been done to get our information, which are not only unworthy of any man, woman, even persons and especially private commerce, who always scream for honor, in the highest degree and thus dishonorable!

Every living, spiritually moral, rational being that has already created a so-called allod document can use its free will and its inherent creative power to correct this error. You don’t need anyone but yourself to do this. Use your own creative power.

Just listen deep inside yourself.

Ask your ego to be still in love, even if it only wants to protect you from its point of view and dive into your inner knowing.

Don't listen to us. Don’t listen to the “sellers” of this movement. Just listen to your inner knowing.

This will show you the way.

Our intention is not to “poach” anyone or “take away business” or whatever.

Our driving force and advantage is truth and purity. 

If I see my human brothers and sisters falling into a trap, it is my duty and my honorable loyalty to the truth to at least show them this trap. So that you can then decide for yourself. The decision then made or not made is their free will and their choice of path. Knowledge brings with it the obligation to share it when one sees that the lie will cause harm.

The attacks on our website and the “interest” that we receive from remote viewers and other “visitors” honor and confirm us in our actions, but we would like to point out that these actions, as announced and recorded, have consequences.

Update 07.04.2021

We had to mirror the article and re-link it because there was no other way to fix these strange “errors” in the article, which caused this article to disappear again and again, as well as the links, images and text passages there, due to the attacks on our website.


GEORGE ORWELL

Freedom is the right to tell others what they don't want to hear.

In order to be truly free in this world with its system, one must discard the borrowed person and cancel the contracts.

It is hereby noted that all rights are reserved to everything found on this site and subject to the order of the Decided Terms of Ama-gi koru-E Kininigen. If someone distributes our knowledge, it would be honourable if he also names the source of this knowledge, which has not been found anywhere else, and does not bring it into the world as his own knowledge in order to enrich his status with it.

Otherwise, we are grateful for the distribution of this knowledge, in the sense of every being.

Facebook
Telegram
VK
Email
en_USEnglish